This is a contribution from members of THINCS, 
The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics  
 

      Home  

 

IS IT WISE TO SCREEN FOR HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA IN CHILDREN?  

Marshall E. Deutsch, Sudbury, MA, USA (med41@aol.com ) and Uffe Ravnskov, Lund, Sweden

Presented as a poster at the 18th International Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine in Kyoto, 2002.

Are High Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children a Matter of Concern?  

The American Heart Association (AHA) recommended in July 2002 that children should have their blood cholesterol levels checked at about the age of five years (1). Reasons given for this did not include any evidence directly connecting children´s cholesterol levels with any morbidity or mortality. The recommendation was accompanied by a set of dietary guidelines which included a recommendation that less than 300 mg of cholesterol should be consumed per day. The bizarre nature of this latter recommendation may be inferred from the fact that, not only is there no evidence that dietary cholesterol is harmful to children, but a recent study (2) demonstrated apparent benefits from addition of egg yolks to the weaning diet of infants.
 

In its discussion, the AHA refers to the United States National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) as a source for the recommendation that attempts be made to lower blood cholesterol levels in children. The NCEP has not furnished data to justify this recommendation, but, in its initial press releases announcing this recommendation (3) presented a chart showing a fairly good correlation between the dietary saturated fat and cholesterol of boys aged 7-9 from six countries and the level of cholesterol in the boys´blood:

 

 

Saturated fat;
% of total calories

Dietary cholesterol;

mg/1000 calories

Blood cholesterol;

mg/deciliter

Ghana

10.5

48

128

Phillippines

9.3

97

147

Italy

10.4

159

159

United States

13.5

151

167

Netherlands

15.1

142

174

Finland

17.7

157

190

 

These data do not show any correlation of cholesterol levels with mortality or any sort of morbidity, and our repeated requesrs to the US National Center for Health Statistics (given as the source of the data in the chart) failed to elicit any indications of such correlations. We therefore referred to another source (4) which listed mortality rates for children under age 5 per 1000 live births in many countries, including the six listed above:

 

 

Blood cholesterol; mg/dl

Child mortality

Ghana

128

145

Phillippines

147

72

Italy

159

12

United States

167

12

Netherlands

174

9

Finland

190

7

 

To see if this relationship applies in countries other than those listed by the NCEP, we checked the Medline database and found data for children under 20 in Mexico (145 and 149 mg cholesterol/dl for boys and girls respectively) and children six to fifteen in Chile (146 and 154 respectively), The Britannica mortality figures for children, as above, were 68 for Mexico and 24 for Chile. These data conform perfectly to the illustrated relationship. 

Even if High Cholesterol Were a Matter of Concern, Would Intervention Be Justifiable?  

Cholesterol lowering in children is based on the assumption that it may be possible to prevent atherosclerotic disease later in life. The main support to that assumption is a weak correlation between the cholesterol concentration in the blood and the amount of fatty streaks seen at autopsy of children who has died without previous disease, taking for granted that fatty streaks are synonymous with early atherosclerosis.
 

But fatty streaks are found worldwide in almost all children, equally often in countries where atherosclerosis is rare, as in countries where it is frequent (5). The development of raised lesions in some individuals later in life must therefore be due to factors other than the mere presence of fatty streaks. 

Even if fatty streaks had been the forerunners of raised lesions, the value of cholesterol screening of children is questionable because concentrations in childhood cannot be tracked to adulthood with any certainty. In one study, for instance, half the hypercholesterolemic children had normal values after 12 years without any treatment (6)

Even if a screening program could identify children at high risk only, and that a lowering of cholesterol could reduce that risk, the question remains of what to do, because meta-analyses of all dietary trials in adults have found no reduction of coronary or total mortality (7) (8) (9)

The only way to lower coronary mortality is by statin treatment. There is no evidence, however, that a possible benefit from such treatment from a young age may balance possible side effects from life-long drug use, because such trials have, luckily, never been performed.  

There is no evidence either, that treating children with familial hypercholesterolemia may be of benefit. In a recent study, where many family entities with familial hypercholesterolemia were traced backwards in time, total mortality was normal and, before year 1900 , even lower than in the general population indicating that it is not the high cholesterol per se that is the cause of early cardiovascular disease in some of these individuals (10).  

Instead of preventing cardiovascular disease cholesterol screening may create families of unhappy hypochondriacs, obsessed with their diet and blood chemistry. Besides, it may have unfortunate effects on the growth of children because foods containing cholesterol and animal fats are rich in important nutrients. Given all the facts and assumptions it is also doubtful if any parents would allow their child to be screened.

Literature 

1.     Williams CL. et al. Cardiovascular health in childhood. Circulation 2002;106:143-60.

2.     Makrides M. Nutritional effect of including egg yolk in the weaning diet of breast-fed and formula-fed infants: a randomised controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:1084-92.

3.       Foreman J. Cholesterol curb urged for children over 2. The Boston Globe. April 9, 1991.

4.      1992 Britannica Book of the Year. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Brittanica, 1992.

5.       Strong JP, Eggen DA, Oalmann MC, Richards ML, Tracy RE. Pathology and epidemiology of atherosclerosis. J Am Diet Assoc 1973; 62: 262-8.

6.       Webber LS, Srinivasan SR, Wattigney WA, Berenson GS. Tracking of serum lipids and lipoproteins from childhood to adulthood. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 884-99.

7.     Ravnskov U. The questionable role of saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids in cardiovascular disease. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 443-460.

8.     Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Higgins JPT, Thompson R, Capps NE, Davey Smith G, et al. Dietary fat intake and prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review. BMJ 2001; 322: 757-763

9.    Ravnskov U. Diet-heart disease hypothesis is wishful thinking. BMJ 2002; 324: 238

10. Sijbrands EJG, Westendorp RGJ,  Defesche, de Meier PHEM, Smelt AHM, Kastelein JJP, and Kaprio J. Mortality over two centuries in large pedigree with familial hypercholesterolaemia: family tree mortality study .BMJ 2001; 322: 1019-1023  


Home